and again... reminder... On 28 October 2014 12:51, Jan Smout <[email protected]> wrote:
> reminder... > > On 21 October 2014 12:49, Jan Smout <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Keith, we are approaching the one year anniversary of this bug already. >> Maybe it is time to finish the patch and leave the issue behind? >> >> >> fyi, I have been running my application with the first version of Jonas's >> patch for 65 days straight now without a glitch (it used to crash in less >> than 20 hours). >> >> I also intend to restart this long duration test once the final patch >> will be released >> >> >> On 27 September 2014 05:23, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Matt Turner <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Jan Smout <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> Keith Packard doesn't seem very responsive (as in 'completely >>> ignoring the >>> >> subject') >>> > >>> > Perhaps you should try Ccing him? (now Cc'd) >>> >>> The problem is that reviewing this patch is *really hard*. The last >>> time, I think I spent a solid couple of days thinking about this and >>> making sure I'd caught all of the cases. I'm still not sure it's right, >>> but I guess it's probably better than what we have? >>> >>> -- >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part. >> > > > > -- > Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part. > -- Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part.
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
