On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:08:09AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: >> No, that patch looks like a hack. It's attempting to do the same as >> Alan's patch, but Alan's patch, minus the incorrect comment, is better >> believable. That is, of course, assuming someone has tested it and >> confirmed that it fixes the problem. > > Well, I've tried to get Michael to test Alan's patch, but he seems to > have mislaid his glint hardware. :( > Not sure what the best way to proceed is in this case. > Thomas
I've got a Blade 2500 and PGX32... I think. It'd take some work to get it set up in a fashion that would let me test this, and I'm not sure it's worth the effort. If the only person who had this bug can't find his hardware, I'm not sure we should put a lot of effort into it. If he does test the patch, let me know. I'll be sure to let you know if I get bored enough to do it myself. :) _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
