On 24/09/16 00:20, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 04:30 PM, Bob Terek wrote:
>> On 09/21/2016 10:22 AM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
>>> On 09/20/2016 02:07 AM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:34:40PM +0700, Antoine Martin wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Antoine Martin <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Looks good to me too (although I'm cheating since this chunk is
>>> identical to part of
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/41058/)
>>
>> Shouldn't the first 5 of Aaron's patches be applied, since they are all
>> cleanup items?
>>
>>     https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2015-January/045395.html
> 
> I never pushed them because they were never reviewed. Would it help if I
> resent them?
Yes, please re-send and I'll make sure to test and review this week.

>> Patch 6 supposedly caused a server crash, but the first 5 should be ok?
> 
> Patch 6 was kind of controversial so I don't know if we want it anyway.
IIRC, I was the one who reported a crash when I tested it - I didn't
investigate it further.

Sounds like Bob Terek's approach is much more complete anyway.

Cheers
Antoine



> 
>> -- 
>> Bob Terek
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected]: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to