Adam Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > So, way back in 946f664b, I removed a cache from the miarc code, with the > justification that arcs were rare and the performance improvement wasn't > worth it. I'd have been more right if the miarc code wasn't, what's the > word, garbage.
Hey, that's some of my finest code from 1989 you're messing with... > Rather than reintroduce the cache, this series holds on to the span data > for the duration of a single pass through the arc. So we'll still compute > things twice for double-dashed arcs, but that's still down in the "small > numbers of milliseconds per arc in the worst case" regime. Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]> -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
