On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 15:20 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > Adam Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > > > So, way back in 946f664b, I removed a cache from the miarc code, with the > > justification that arcs were rare and the performance improvement wasn't > > worth it. I'd have been more right if the miarc code wasn't, what's the > > word, garbage. > > Hey, that's some of my finest code from 1989 you're messing with...
I assume this is meant in the same sense that The Onion is America's Finest News Source. > > Rather than reintroduce the cache, this series holds on to the span data > > for the duration of a single pass through the arc. So we'll still compute > > things twice for double-dashed arcs, but that's still down in the "small > > numbers of milliseconds per arc in the worst case" regime. > > Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 9426c5500b72e1fe004fef4c3b259023c4ec49f7. remote: I: patch #141523 updated using rev 849c825855b82caf44d25edb8155bc9f17869256. remote: I: patch #141524 updated using rev 0d7f05ed99b71a4641415c9f26e245c3bb24a9a0. remote: I: 2 patch(es) updated to state Accepted. To ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/xserver fe5c340..0d7f05e master -> master - ajax _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
