On 17/12/16 02:04, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On 9 December 2016 at 22:25, Bob Terek <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 12/09/2016 03:13 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >>> On 6 December 2016 at 22:41, Bob Terek <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Resubmitting some of Aaron Plattner's cleanup patches to >>>> xf86-video-dummy: >>>> >>>> https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2015-January/045395.html >>>> . . . >>>> . . . >> >> >>> Afaict the patches are literally unchanged since Aaron's submit. As >>> such changing the authorship is a bit ... bad. >> >> >> Oops, sorry for the breach in protocol. Do I need to do something specific >> to "withdraw" the patch I sent? Should I do something at Patchwork? >> I've restored the "author" and added Bob as "Reviewed-by" instead.
> Updating patchwork would be very good, indeed. > >> I'm going to submit an alternative approach to Aaron's 6/6, and was going >> to include the remaining cleanups, but then it was thought the cleanups >> should be addressed separately. So then for some reason I thought they >> needed to be submitted again, against the current version. . . >> > Agreed. These patches have been reviewed and tested quite a few times now. I've just created a git repo with all the uncontroversial pending changes to the dummy driver, 6 so far: https://github.com/totaam/xf86-video-dummy/commits/master What else can I do to help move this along? Thanks Antoine > > Thanks > Emil > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel > _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
