On 21 November 2017 at 06:43, Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > I started writing a review of Olivier's patch and got sidetracked. I > can't really think of a good reason _not_ to generate a core if > possible, even for xfree86, and I think things look a lot simpler if we > do:
These look like a good idea, Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> > > hw/kdrive/src/kdrive.c | 14 -------- > hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h | 4 --- > hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c | 38 > ---------------------- > hw/xfree86/common/xf86Globals.c | 1 - > hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c | 6 ---- > hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c | 17 ++-------- > hw/xfree86/common/xf86Priv.h | 2 -- > hw/xfree86/common/xf86Privstr.h | 1 - > hw/xfree86/doc/ddxDesign.xml | 10 ------ > .../os-support/linux/int10/vm86/linux_vm86.c | 13 +------- > include/os.h | 3 -- > os/osinit.c | 25 +++----------- > 12 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-) > > - ajax > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
