On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 00:56 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > A friend of mine (Cc:'ed), who has the very same laptop as me, > investigated the problem a little further, and it appeared that the > line is the guilty: > Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
On Fri Jun 1 00:10:32 PDT 2007, Michel Dänzer wrote: > EXA performance was improved significantly in xserver 1.3. Actually, my Xorg experience upgrading from FC6 to FC7 is exactly the same as Jeremie's. I even raised this Fedora bug about it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242386 > In the meantime, Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy" might provide similar > performance as with > X.org 6.9. Interesting - I shall try this. > In general though, EXA is only expected to give a benefit when using a > compositing manager. I tried using XOrg 7.2 with a compositing manager and EXA, and the result was so slow as to be unusable. So now I am back to using XAA. Isn't XAA the "old" acceleration architecture that EXA is supposed to replace, though? Cheers, Chris ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
