http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16001
--- Comment #11 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-21 06:28:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > I've gone ahead and pushed the first part of this since it makes a > > noticeable > > improvement on r2xx/r3xx and the OV0_SCALE_CNTL setup is obviously wrong on > > r2xx+. > > The defaults for gamma 1.0 slope should be 0x100 according to the > > databooks, so > > it appears that is correct too. > > b7c80d0c86646105d2bce5d4d59ba6c45aa7cafc > > Ok. I still see 3 problems. One is purely cosmetic (no need for > reading/writing > ov0_scale_cntl at all for r200 and up chips in the setgamma function), but the good point. > other two look real. First, it seems (for r100 chips) the gamma set in the > ov0_scale_cntl reg gets overwritten in the RadeonDisplayVideo function (makes > me wonder actually why those bogus gamma_sel bits on r200 and up have any > effect at all since they just gets set to 0 anyway?). Probably not. > Also, if the first 3 values for the gamma 1.0 curve were wrong, those for the > other gamma curves look wrong to me too. > Definitely possible. I got the tables from ati years ago. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
