http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16001
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Diedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-21 13:34:27 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > Ok. I still see 3 problems. One is purely cosmetic (no need for > reading/writing > ov0_scale_cntl at all for r200 and up chips in the setgamma function), but the > other two look real. First, it seems (for r100 chips) the gamma set in the > ov0_scale_cntl reg gets overwritten in the RadeonDisplayVideo function (makes > me wonder actually why those bogus gamma_sel bits on r200 and up have any > effect at all since they just gets set to 0 anyway?). Well, I did notice that they only had an effect until the image was moved or unpaused (I did my most of my tests with a paused MPlayer window, before I modified the XVideo test application). > Also, if the first 3 values for the gamma 1.0 curve were wrong, those for the > other gamma curves look wrong to me too. Yeah, that was my impression too. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
