http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25884
--- Comment #7 from Chris Rankin <[email protected]> 2010-03-19 07:09:37 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > Maybe better implementation would be using VBO for vertex data so we could > handle large number of clip regions better. (and possible only emit them when > there is change) Hmm, this bug exists on lowly Radeon 7000 cards as well; do they support VBOs? > The number of clip regions is too high for single command stream which causes > trouble. Does the maximum size of a single command stream increase in subsequent Radeon iterations? Because on rv100 and rv280, the X server must be restarted, but the X server recovers with my RV350 and handles the stream fine with my RV790. (BTW, how does a "stream" have a "maximum size" anyway? By mere definition of a "stream", I'd expect it to "start" and then chatter away until it met an "end" marker. So I suspect it doesn't work like that really ... ;-).) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
