> wfb works everywhere fb does (i.e. everywhere). fb is the normal > software rasterisation code, which takes a bass address, stride, etc, > and writes directly to that range. wfb is literally the exact same > codebase as fb, but instead of writing directly to memory, will issue a > function call, if you've set read/write functions, and ask you to please > write this pixel value to this location. This gives you the opportunity > to mangle it however you please: change the ordering, tile it, whatever. > > So yes, it's completely fine.
That sounds good, but I'm afraid I don't understand how I could change from fb to wfb, and how I would then use that to fix the problem. /Leon _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
