On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:53:34 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> This case was missing and could cause corruption if we flush damage events
> to a client before the driver gets to submit the rendering from the
> callback chain.

Seems like this is a good candidate for 1.9, yes? Is there a specific
bug that this helps address?

Also, there is one more call to FlushClient in CloseDownConnection; any
reason we shouldn't be invoking the FlushCallback there too? More from a
sense of completeness than a chance that it's going to actually matter.

Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]>

-- 
[email protected]

Attachment: pgpimcJyjsBJr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: [email protected]

Reply via email to