If you are really serious about your comments I'm sure both Nokia and Google would be pleased to pay you a big bunch of money to fix the bugs and shortcommings you mention (http://qt.nokia.com/about/careers/)
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski <curi...@bwv190.internetdsl.tpnet.pl> wrote: >> Nima Sahraneshin <unix.n...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> I want to write a program based on X .I need some documentation about >>> X (using X) . >> >> Assuming that you want to make an "ordinary" application that is going >> to run under X, you really want to use a toolkit. These days, Qt >> (http://qt.nokia.com/) and Gtk (http://www.gtk.org/) are probably the >> best alternatives. >> >> They are much easier to work with than coding directly for X, and they >> do a lot of things for you that is otherwise a royal pain to get right. > > they both have serious shortcomings, and bugs, which make > target application either non-functional after routine API changes (nokia) > or bloated, buggy and slow (gtk). > > coding either directly for X or using lighter toolkits (i.e. fltk) > has some point, and saves royal withdrawal after royal painkillers. > > -- > _______________________________________________ > xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support > Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg > Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg > Your subscription address: enrique.arizonben...@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com