Dnia czwartek, 13 stycznia 2011 o 16:06:26 Johannes Truschnigg napisał(a): > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:29:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote: > > The problem with being a maintainer for anything related to the Free > > Desktop is the invalid security certificate for Bugzilla. <URL: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2010-December/011735.html > > > > > Chris > > The certificate and its signature are invalid only through the goggles your > specific browser is wearing.
I would say it is THE browser, as far as free browsers are concerned. Is it the only browser that has doubts about CACert? > I suppose we could argue about the benefits and > woes of Certificate Authorities themselves for the better part of an > eternity, but why don't you just suck it up and impot CACert's class1 and > class3 roots into your trusted certificate store? It's at least as good as > any other "hey, just give us your CC and a 100 bucks, and we'll confirm you > to be anyone you could ever want to impose!"-CA, so I don't see how this > minor detail could be blocking the road for anything or anyone... StartSSL is FREE (as in beer) and valid. Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: [email protected]
