Thanks for the reply. I have coded my prototype protocol process. Two things I am still working on. In order to start dependended modules, it takes a long time. Sencond, it static routes is having a depending nodule, I dont want cli to delete xorp_static_routes. C++ xrl interface functions are working fine. My process can use them directly talking to static routes to update the routes.
--- On Mon, 10/19/09, Bruce Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Bruce Simpson <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] static xrl interface calls > To: "Li Zhao" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 11:06 AM > Li Zhao wrote: > > Actually this is a generic question. For any new > config coming from xorpsh, how are these xrl client > functions sent to the target process from rtrmgr? > > > > The Router Manager uses the textual Finder protocol to make > indirect XRL method calls, as it parses the configuration > tree; it does not use the C++ bindings directly. Please see > the '*.xrls' files generated as part of the XRL stubs. > > thanks, > BMS > > _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
