If we pick 2 second as sleep time, that might not a good idea.

--- On Mon, 10/19/09, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Ben Greear <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] static xrl interface calls
> To: "Li Zhao" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Bruce Simpson" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 1:29 PM
> On 10/19/2009 09:57 AM, Li Zhao
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply. I have coded my prototype
> protocol process. Two things I am still working on. In order
> to start dependended modules, it takes a long time. Sencond,
> it static routes is having a depending nodule, I dont want
> cli to delete xorp_static_routes. C++ xrl interface
> functions are working fine. My process can use them directly
> talking to static routes to update the routes.
> 
> I also have patches in my tree to start up modules
> quicker...(removes a 2-second sleep for each module,
> basically).
> 
> But, since this is a one-time cost, it shouldn't be too bad
> even w/out the patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 
> 
> >
> > --- On Mon, 10/19/09, Bruce Simpson<[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Bruce Simpson<[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] static xrl interface
> calls
> >> To: "Li Zhao"<[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 11:06 AM
> >> Li Zhao wrote:
> >>> Actually this is a generic question. For any
> new
> >> config coming from xorpsh, how are these xrl
> client
> >> functions sent to the target process from rtrmgr?
> >>>
> >>
> >> The Router Manager uses the textual Finder
> protocol to make
> >> indirect XRL method calls, as it parses the
> configuration
> >> tree; it does not use the C++ bindings directly.
> Please see
> >> the '*.xrls' files generated as part of the XRL
> stubs.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> BMS
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xorp-hackers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ben Greear <[email protected]>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
> 
> 


      

_______________________________________________
Xorp-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers

Reply via email to