On 12/18/2009 11:55 AM, Li Zhao wrote: > Fix has been implemented and tested in two cases: > 1. redistributing static routes to ospf4 and ospf6. > 2. redistributing connected routes to ospf4 and ospf6. > > In both two cases, the improper behavior was gone. So this is a generic > fix not limited to specific protocol. Based on the current policy code > architecture, I think this is a reasonably fix to the root cause. >
I applied this to my tree. It compiles and I see nothing obviously wrong with the code, but haven't run other tests..will do so when I'm back from vacation. Thanks for tracking this down! Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
