Thnaks for the help. I haven't run test cases which will redistribute BGP/RIP to ospf4 and ospf6 in the same time. But I would guess that should work too.
Li --- On Fri, 12/18/09, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Ben Greear <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] ospf4 and ospf6 can not apply export policy at > the same time > To: "Li Zhao" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Bruce Simpson" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Date: Friday, December 18, 2009, 4:38 PM > On 12/18/2009 11:55 AM, Li Zhao > wrote: > > Fix has been implemented and tested in two cases: > > 1. redistributing static routes to ospf4 and ospf6. > > 2. redistributing connected routes to ospf4 and > ospf6. > > > > In both two cases, the improper behavior was gone. So > this is a generic > > fix not limited to specific protocol. Based on the > current policy code > > architecture, I think this is a reasonably fix to the > root cause. > > > > I applied this to my tree. It compiles and I see > nothing obviously wrong > with the code, but haven't run other tests..will do > so when I'm back from vacation. > > Thanks for tracking this down! > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- > Ben Greear <[email protected]> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
