On 04/15/10 07:48, Ben Greear wrote: > ... > I'm not too sure. It might be that horribly complex template > thing that builds callbacks methods. If I were to tackle it, I'd > probably change some callback signatures to pass in const string& > and then see what broke and try to work backwards from there... >
Futzing with 'string' might be a noop, because many STL implementations ref-count the internal string representation (GNU libstdc++ does, for example). _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
