Thanks for the fix Ben. On -Werror, on many occasions it's annoyed me, but on a fair number of occasions it's saved my bacon. I'd rather keep it and do the right thing. Just my personal view though.
Regarding boost, I think how we left it on the phone call last night was that Bruce would write a short note saying what he believes boost gives us, and why it's the right thing for Xorp. So I'd like to wait for that before we make a decision. - Mark On 23 April 2010 17:39, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just committed a fix for the Fedora 12 build issue to svn. > > Sparc compile still fails due to alignment issues. I have > a fairly invasive patch that changes the Arp code that fixes > some of this, but a simpler patch (and required regardless of > Arp changes) is to just not use -Werror when compiling on non-x86 > platforms. > > Shall I go ahead and commit the -Werror change so that sparc will > build (with warnings)? I'll push the bigger changes into rls 1.8 > once we have 1.7 released. > > Aside from sparc-build, I'd like for us to decide if we are removing > boost requirement or not. If we agree to remove it, I will happily > submit patches to do so, including a re-work of Bruce's patch that > added boost smart pointers. > > Other than that, I think we can go ahead and finalize a 1.7 release. > > We can tag it so that we can always go back and branch off a bug-fix > branch if we desire, but I see no need to branch before it's proven > to be required. > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- > Ben Greear <[email protected]> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers > _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
