On 23 April 2010 18:23, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/23/2010 10:10 AM, Mark Handley wrote: >> >> Thanks for the fix Ben. >> >> On -Werror, on many occasions it's annoyed me, but on a fair number of >> occasions it's saved my bacon. I'd rather keep it and do the right >> thing. Just my personal view though. > > I'm all for fixing the warnings, but the netlink related alignment errors on > Linux > cannot be fixed in a useful manner as far as I can tell because the errors > are in the > standard linux include headers.
Fair enough. I just want to minimize the code that is compiled without -Werror, not reduce it to absolutely zero. >> Regarding boost, I think how we left it on the phone call last night >> was that Bruce would write a short note saying what he believes boost >> gives us, and why it's the right thing for Xorp. So I'd like to wait >> for that before we make a decision. > > Agreed. I'd just like to make the decision before 1.7 is released > so that anyone packaging xorp doesn't have to deal with boost if they > don't have to. Definitely. - Mark _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
