Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > > On 30 Jan 2002, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > > I've decided to add some pertinent comments from Mike Harris regarding > > the availability of documentation under NDA to the DRI Devel FAQ ( > > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/faq/html/hardware.html#ATI-SPECS ) > > > > In the comments Mike makes strong reference to join as XFree86 developer > > as a mean to obtain NDA documentation that is shared to all XFree86 > > developers, but it was mentioned in the last IRC meeting that this is no > > longer true. > > > > The fact is that the XFree86 developer page > > (http://www.xfree.org/developer.html) makes no mention to this and I > > would like to know if this still holds true or not. > > > > At one time, the XFree86 project had some chip docs under > NDA and you had to officially become an XFree86 member (join our > corporation) to have access to it. Times have changed. I don't > know of any documentation that the XFree86 project keeps that > isn't available elsewhere. There are still alot of individuals > and projects that have NDA'd documentation, but these are not > NDAs with the XFree86 Project Inc. XFree86 doesn't really > sign NDAs anymore because it hasn't been necessary. > > Mark.
Do you know of a place for S3 ViRGE documentation? s3graphics/Via is still requiring an NDA for this information, some of which XFree86 has, but which I assume is still covered by S3's original NDA with XFree86. Is that not the case? -- Kevin _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
