On 1 Jul 2002, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> MV> DGA really shouldn't be used and I regret that it's still in the
> MV> X-server. I would like it to disappear in XFree86 5.0.
>
> Mark,
>
> I fully agree with your feeling, and I am sincerely sorry to say what
> I'm about to say.
>
> There is no denying, though, that there are applications that want to
> do client-side rendering -- and I think that's a perfectly legitimate
> thing to do. The obvious solutions (PutImage and ShmPutImage) either
> involve one copy too many, or else require you to put your rendering
> buffers in a shared memory segment.
>
> I may be mistaken, but as far as I can see, the only way to do a
> direct blit from a random client-specified buffer is DGA. Unless we
> provide a different way to do that, there is little chance of DGA
> going away with no loss.
>
DGA going a away is a security gain, and also removes a sticky
and frequently broken part of driver operation. Good riddence.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
