Hello Michel, Sorry for the long time before replaying to your message. I was busy to found the problem related to X and finaly found it. It was related to the fact that I've used the following optimization FLAGS to compile it and it look like X don't like it at all. More than that, I cannot compile X with optimization FLAGS and if I do it, then it will segmenfault on the binary. Seem strange to me that a software like XFree86 cannot use optimization FLAGS durring compile time. Here is what I used as optimization --> "-O2 -march=i686 -funroll-loops" and XFree86 fail. Again without the previous optimization FLAGS, all run ok.
For me, this mean that XFree86 cannot be compiled to get advantage of i686 CPU architecture :(( Regards, >From: Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Xpert]X return segmentation fault when trying to start it >Date: 17 Aug 2002 13:27:50 +0200 > >On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 03:07, Wahib Nackad wrote: > > > > Thanks for your answer to my email. I appreciate a lot. Related to your > > suggestion about the fact that the problem may comes from the headers >files > > comming from linux kernal instead of glibc, I've installed glibc headers > > files and recompiled the kernel, then recompiled XFree86 with the new > > headers files comming from glibc and the new kernel. > >The kernel doesn't matter, just the headers. Not that this is likely >going to help... :/ > > >-- >Earthling Michel D�nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer >XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast >_______________________________________________ >Xpert mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
