On Die, 2002-10-22 at 16:55, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On 22 Oct 2002, Michel D�nzer wrote: > > > > That the new header is being picked up seems the only viable explanantion > > > for the reported symptom. How it got there is irrelevant. Perhaps > > > re-installing glibc from source re-syncs the headers, I don't know. Or, > > > possibly, this system simply does not implement the glibc/kernel version > > > skew some distributions are so prone to. > > > I'm sure you mean the sane technical solution explained in > > http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html ? > > I'd be able to tell you if that site currently accepted connections.
Works here, but you can try http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=96468376406463&w=2 instead. > But, again, where /usr/include/linux/kd.h comes from is irrelevant to the > reported problem. Definitely not. > As far as I'm concerned, this issue is closed until such a time when the > kernel folk again rename something they shouldn't. Can't you see that the kernel folks can do whatever they want, so long as people use a sane setup where there are no kernel headers in /usr/include? -- Earthling Michel D�nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
