On Die, 2002-10-22 at 17:34, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On 22 Oct 2002, Michel D�nzer wrote: > > > > As far as I'm concerned, this issue is closed until such a time when the > > > kernel folk again rename something they shouldn't. > > > Can't you see that the kernel folks can do whatever they want, so long > > as people use a sane setup where there are no kernel headers in > > /usr/include? > > glibc's /usr/include/linux/kd.h ultimately hails from the kernel's > include/linux/kd.h. The field name change was propagated through this > system's upgrade to a bleeding edge glibc.
Less bleeding edge than the kernel it was built against, apparently, or I'd expect it to deal with the rename. > My argument stands. It always does, no need to spell it out... -- Earthling Michel D�nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
