Hi,
I tried updating some old refinement scripts that use the "sani"  
statement to incorporate RDC data, with fixed values of axial and  
rhombic terms that we get by fitting experimental RDCs to calculated  
structures in the PALES program.  (I know there are better ways of  
doing this these days, but I was in a hurry).   PALES outputs values  
that need to be corrected for the maximum dipolar couplings of a  
given spin pair. I used three sets of RDCs, N-NH, C'-Ca and N-C'.   
After the correction, the absolute values of A and Rh that I get for  
all three sets are very similar (all obtained with the same alignment  
medium, so no surprise there).

My question is, once XPLOR gets the A and Rh terms, how does it  
correct for the differences in the magnitudes of the couplings when  
calculating the energetics and errors?  Two of the classes that I  
used in defining the RDCs had arbitrary names (JNC and JCC).  Only  
JNH is a class that was previously defined in the script.  I note  
that our fits from PALES are much better than what the output of  
XPLOR suggests they are; so I suspect there is some correction term  
that I am missing.

Thanks,
Tom Pochapsky



Reply via email to