OK, thanks.  Follow-on question, in the statement
evaluate ($rms_sani_JNH=$result)
evaluate ($R_sani_JNH=$result/12.3)

How are the $rms values determined?  And what is the factor of 12.3 for?

Thanks,

Tom

On Jun 24, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Charles at Schwieters.org wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hello Tom--
>
>> I tried updating some old refinement scripts that use the "sani"
>> statement to incorporate RDC data, with fixed values of axial and
>> rhombic terms that we get by fitting experimental RDCs to calculated
>> structures in the PALES program.  (I know there are better ways of
>> doing this these days, but I was in a hurry).   PALES outputs values
>> that need to be corrected for the maximum dipolar couplings of a
>> given spin pair. I used three sets of RDCs, N-NH, C'-Ca and N-C'.
>> After the correction, the absolute values of A and Rh that I get for
>> all three sets are very similar (all obtained with the same alignment
>> medium, so no surprise there).
>>
>> My question is, once XPLOR gets the A and Rh terms, how does it
>> correct for the differences in the magnitudes of the couplings when
>> calculating the energetics and errors?  Two of the classes that I
>> used in defining the RDCs had arbitrary names (JNC and JCC).  Only
>> JNH is a class that was previously defined in the script.  I note
>> that our fits from PALES are much better than what the output of
>> XPLOR suggests they are; so I suspect there is some correction term
>> that I am missing.
>>
>
> In the old XPLOR scripts, you must specify separate COEF statements  
> for
> classes with experiments involving different nulcei. You must make  
> sure
> that the values of Da are scaled appropriately. In the Python  
> interface
> there are tools to help with this.
>
> best regards--
> Charles
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http:// 
> mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkwjoxwACgkQPK2zrJwS/lY+hwCfdbdc2+g/3caKVaWbOl6oDGEL
> kPsAn3J4agIstbZEDKun78sOlh4PG/ey
> =C0Wr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to