On 05/05/14 20:18, Jay Sorg wrote: > I turned on the bulk compressor by default in v0.8 and devel branches. > LK fixed it back in January. > We've been running long haul test with MTSC and it seems good. > > I did some bandwidth numbers here. > http://www.xrdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31:bandwidth-compare&catid=2:documents&Itemid=7 > > Almost always xrdp uses less bandwidth than MS server to MS client. :) > If you turn on jpeg and use NeutrinoRDP client it can even be 3x less.
Thinking aloud here, could you use this with x11rdp to improve video playback? That is implement the Xvideo extension, grab the YUV data sent to the "card" re-compress using JPEG (libjepg and libjpeg-turbo have entry points for compressing YUV data) and spit out to the RDP client? I guess there could be issues with scaling at the client end? > > Also, I did some RemoteFX bandwidth tests so you can see. RFX is always > higher. > I was under the impression that RemoteFX was not about reducing bandwidth, but about providing GPU support, and USB redirection. The codec bit of RemoteFX was as I understood it to provide a fast high-fidelity experience for both video and text with optional GPU acceleration of the compression. Or am I missing something? JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ xrdp-devel mailing list xrdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xrdp-devel
