>> Almost always xrdp uses less bandwidth than MS server to MS client. :) >> If you turn on jpeg and use NeutrinoRDP client it can even be 3x less. > > Thinking aloud here, could you use this with x11rdp to improve video > playback? That is implement the Xvideo extension, grab the YUV data sent > to the "card" re-compress using JPEG (libjepg and libjpeg-turbo have > entry points for compressing YUV data) and spit out to the RDP client? > > I guess there could be issues with scaling at the client end?
Using XV extension sounds like a fun project. I'm sure it will work great. This will only help apps like VLC and mplayer. Flash and html 5 video don't use XV extension. >> Also, I did some RemoteFX bandwidth tests so you can see. RFX is always >> higher. >> > > I was under the impression that RemoteFX was not about reducing > bandwidth, but about providing GPU support, and USB redirection. The > codec bit of RemoteFX was as I understood it to provide a fast > high-fidelity experience for both video and text with optional GPU > acceleration of the compression. > > Or am I missing something? No, you are right. Bandwidth is not the benefit of RFX. It does make an interesting comparison anyway. Jay ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ xrdp-devel mailing list xrdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xrdp-devel
