On Friday, November 19, 2004 at 23:23:54, Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote: > On Friday, November 19, 2004 at 02:26:58, Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote: > > I have tagged the 0.9 line and added two simple patches > > related to replay. > > > > They are in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > at http://www.robf.de/Hacking/arch > > Hmm I am not sure my "fix" (patch-1) was a fix. > Revisions get applied in the order as they have > been marked. Due to the descending list I marked > them in descending order, which was causing my > troubles.
I tested this with the wrong tree, i.e. the one with the fix. So now think its correct. We do not provide a facility to the user to specify the order of the revisions to replay, but I also cannot think of any real good reason why we should. Robert.
