On Tuesday, November 23, 2004 at 01:26:07, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We do not provide a facility to the user to specify the
> > order of the revisions to replay, but I also cannot think of
> > any real good reason why we should.
>
> I've rejected your patch and replaced it by an alphabetical sort of
> the patch names. Seems it just does the right thing.
In the first moment, much clearer and easier to unserstand,
but wrong, e.g. if you have more than 9 revisions.
(sort '("1" "2" "10") 'string<) => ("1" "10" "2")
Use a different predicate if you want to use sort!
Robert
