Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The original issue was that SLIME would define its own version of >> read-directory-name if it wasn't already fbound, but this version had >> slightly different semantics to the standard read-directory-name[1]. This >> is why I implemented tla--read-directory-name in terms of >> read-file-name--we can't rely on read-directory-name to behave >> correctly, even if it is present. > > Is it issue of xtla? I think it is should be solved in SLIME. > Because read-directory-name is part of standard emacs function now. > > What can we do if car and cdr is hacked in the other package? > Should we provide our own replacement?
I think you're right, this issue is probably better solved within SLIME. Would we still want to keep our own version of the function around for present compatibility's sake? Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
