Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The question about these function name. > > (defun tla--read-archive-category-branch-version-revision-name > (defun tla--read-archive-category-branch-version-revision-name-for-tree > > I think the name is too long (in spite of my code:-P).
Heheh I agree. I try to wrap my lines to a max of 79 characters, and this is hard when the symbol alone is 64 characters :o) > My proposal is rename above function like: > > tla--read-A > tla--read-A/C > tla--read-A/C--B > tla--read-A/C--B--V > tla--read-A/C--B--V--R > tla--read-A-for-tree > > Approval or objection? Yep, agreement from me. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
