Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It looks like `tla--new-error-buffer' was removed in the cleanup of >> xtla-core? The `tla--run-arch' function still seems to use this--do we >> really want to remove it? > > In whose tree? > If mine, I've just removed the duplicated definition in Mattheu's > patch-205.
Ah, I see. It went missing after merging in your changes--it looks like I didn't pick up the duplicated definition from Matthieu's tree when I merged, so I ended up with no definitions at all! :o) Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
