> >> It looks like `tla--new-error-buffer' was removed in the cleanup of
> >> xtla-core?  The `tla--run-arch' function still seems to use this--do we
> >> really want to remove it?
> >
> > In whose tree?

BTW, what is the fastest way to know this, "In whose tree?"?

cvs annotate is useful. The similar is in tla or xtla?

Reply via email to