Hi all :o) I've just been thinking about adding support for marking multiple revisions to be replayed into some source tree (as suggested by Robert in TODO).
At the moment it seems that it's only possible to mark a single revision at a time using 'm' and the only functionality that uses this is tla-revision-delta. For what I'm doing it'd be quite handy to allow the user to mark multiple revisions but this raises the question of how revdelta should behave when the user has marked more than one revision. I was thinking of modifying revdelta so that if you hit "d" on patch-n it would give you a delta between patch-(n-1) and patch-n, and if you supply a prefix argument it would prompt you for the two revisions to use (or maybe just the "other" revision). This would remove its dependency on marks and we could write something more general for marking multiple revisions. Would this new behaviour especially annoy anyone? Admittedly I haven't used the revdelta functionality all that much, so I'm not really the best person to make judgements on usability :o) Any thoughts? Thanks, Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
