Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all :o) > > I've just been thinking about adding support for marking multiple > revisions to be replayed into some source tree (as suggested by Robert > in TODO). > > At the moment it seems that it's only possible to mark a single revision > at a time using 'm' and the only functionality that uses this is > tla-revision-delta. For what I'm doing it'd be quite handy to allow the > user to mark multiple revisions but this raises the question of how > revdelta should behave when the user has marked more than one revision. > > I was thinking of modifying revdelta so that if you hit "d" on patch-n > it would give you a delta between patch-(n-1) and patch-n, and if you > supply a prefix argument it would prompt you for the two revisions to > use (or maybe just the "other" revision). This would remove its > dependency on marks and we could write something more general for > marking multiple revisions. > > Would this new behaviour especially annoy anyone? Admittedly I haven't > used the revdelta functionality all that much, so I'm not really the > best person to make judgements on usability :o) Any thoughts?
I didn't use the features you explained also. But I think, that your new ideas sound good. Please go ahead and implement them. Stefan.
