(I start a new thread.)
From: Stefan Reichör <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think `tla-revision-return' is not good name.
> >
> You are absolutely right.
>
> What about: tla-revision-show-changeset?
>
> Are there any other function or variable names that should be renamed?
> Now we can still rename functions as we like.
> After a first major release we should stick to the names we have choosen.
(defun tla-revision-return ()
and
(defun tla-changes-return (&optional other-file)
are not good names. Maybe the names come from their key bindings.
Renaming candidates:
tla-revision-return => tla-revision-show-changeset (proposed by Stefan)
tla-changes-return => tla-changes-show-diff
Masatake YAMATO
