Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Good. BTW, Is there anyway to generate conflicts repeatedly? > I'd like to write bridge xtla and smerge-mode.
Sorry, I have no idea here. But I am looking forward for a good way to handle conflicts. > Two random ideas. I have no strong opinion/idea. > > - The command is rather directory oriented. It is not bad to be called from > dired. > (I like dired:-) The bad news is that ?T is bound to dired-do-touch. Yeah, the dired map is rather full already. We can add it to the xtla menu and we can advertise the function in the commentary section of xtla.el > - A bit crazy idea: Bind the funciton to ?< in *tla-revision* buffer. > Analogy of ?> (get). Not sure about this. I would not expect this functionality there. > > > - From the archive browser, there should be an option to offer the > > > user to create a new project, as you can already create new empty > > > categories, branches, and versions. > > > > This was needed before the above (more user friendly way) was > > available. I do not know, if one would ever need the ability to create > > a category, a branch or a version. > > Does someone else need such a feature? > > Finally archive browser should have such features. > However, I think we should concentrate tla-inventory related functions till > releasing > version 0.1, 0.99 or 1.0. > > One of the primary target of xtla is pcl-cvs users. pcl-cvs users may expect > xtla.el > to have functions found in pcl-cvs. I think you are right and wrong here ;-) My first idea for xtla.el was also the tla-inventory mode. Now we have the nice bookmark features from Matthieu. I really enjoy them now. It seems to me, they are more arch like. On the other side, you can use arch as replacement for cvs. And then the tla-inventory functionlity seems very important. > How do you think add "priority" to the TODO list item? > > e.g. > > Toward version 1.0: > - tla-invetory > ... > ... > Toward version 2.0: > - tla-browse based on tree-widget.el > ... > - tla command supports in dired.el I have no strong opinion here. I think, everyone should add the features he needs in xtla.el as we do it now. Stefan.
