Oblio wrote:
http://www.dsslive.org/xubuntu/tmp/artworks/html/logos.html
I believe the original logo is best. It looks really sharp. The
crooked logos beneath aren't really close to the K/Ed/Ubuntu.
If it's too light (which I don't believe), I think the second one,
just below the original is the way to go.
I know everyone wants to be creative, but a logo should be both
distinctive, and clear. It shouldn't be too "heavy" on colours, and
lines. The first one fits that role perfectly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman6/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>
and save big.
I like the second logo in the fourth column...
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
