Wow, a lot has been said here since I wrote my email two days ago, I guess it 
will be hard to address all of your thoughts/inputs, so I'll focus on a few.

Browser:
The argument that chromium doesn't look integrated is only true for version <9, 
later versions are gtk-themeable and the theme I'm currently working on already 
themes chromium (it will basically look like FF does now). If wanted/needed I 
can provide screenshots.

Two important points seem to be the updates and the larger package-size, the 
first one seeming more major to me. So if I understand the implications of what 
Micah wanted to say with this correctly it means that our default browser could 
break within a cycle via an update (which is pretty bad imo).

I assume (I have not really checked) and have heard several times that chromium 
uses less memory than FF, it definitely feels snappier.

All in all personally I vote for sticking to FF unless the problematic updates 
can be prevented/solved somehow.


Email:
I think that the average user will be able to handle either Thunderbird or 
Claws. While it's true that Claws' gui is a bit cluttered, it also bears a lot 
of features/plugins for power-users.
If we find out that we can get rid of xulrunner (and maybe even save some 
megabytes on the package-size) by removing Thunderbird as well I vote for going 
with Claws.


Music:
I personally can't say that I like Exaile. I've been working on the above 
mentioned gmusicbrowser for a while now, upstream is very responsive and 
cooperative. The only issues I can see now are that it doesn't support webradio 
(yet) and iPod-support is also unavailable. Its package-size is also pretty 
small (2mb smaller than Exaile), here's a link to the version I maintain (you 
can also test it via the ppa): 
http://shimmerproject.org/projects/shimmer-for-gmusicbrowser/



It would be nice if any of you have the time (unfortunately I don't currently) 
to set up a wiki-page to collect and order the most important arguments brought 
up in this discussion. Mailinglists are nice because it feels a lot more 
responsive than commonly edited wiki-pages, but for structuring the arguments 
it would be helpful.

Simon

-- 
xubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel

Reply via email to