Gerald Bauer wrote:
Hello,
allow me to highlight the latest interview with Miguel de Icaza, co-founder of Gnome, Ximian and Mono.
Miguel writes:
Microsoft realises today that Linux is competing for some of the green pastures that it's been enjoying for so long; I think that Longhorn is a big attempt to take back what they owned before. Longhorn has kind of a scary technology called Avalon, which when compounded with another technology called XAML, it's fairly dangerous. And the reason is that they've made it so it's basically an HTML replacement. The advantage is it's probably as easy as writing HTML, so that means that anybody can produce this content with a text editor.
It's basically an HTML Next Generation. A lot more widgets, a lot more flexibility, more richer experience - way, way richer experience. You get basically the native client experience with Web- like deployments. So you develop these extremely rich applications but they can be deployed as easily as the Web is. It's just like going to a URL: you go to Google, and you get the Web page and it works. So it's the same deployment model but the user interface interaction is just fantastic.
Of course, the only drawback is that this new interaction is completely tied to .Net and WinFX. So we see that as a very big danger. A lot of people today cannot migrate to Linux or cannot migrate to Mozilla because a lot of their internal Web sites happen to use IE extensions. Now imagine a world where you can only use XAML.
It's massive - I'm so scared.
Source: http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2004/04/28/interview_with_miguel_de_icaza_cofounder_of_gnome_ximian_and_mono.html
What's your take on it? Do you buy the official Microsoft party line that Avalon XAML is *not* a HTML Next Generation thingy at all but that Avalon XAML is just a new way to build Windows 2007 applications and that's it. Or are you scared like Miguel because Avalon XAML is so massive? Do you think anybody cares?
Let us know what you think.
- Gerald
Miguel and other should stop smoking cocaļne ! :-)
The goal of HTML and the goal of XAML/XUL are very very very different.
HTML : to publish content XAML/XUL : to do user interface for application.
XAML or XUL will replace HTML, but only in web *application*. Not in web *site*.
keep this distinction in mind.
HTML/XHTML will exist for many and many and many years... (with evolution of course, but philosophy of HTML will be keeped).
-- Laurent Jouanneau http://ljouanneau.com http://xulfr.org developpez des applis Mozilla http://openweb.eu.org pour les standards du web
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
