Hello, > I really don't understand what this solves. If your > advocating that HTML support basic XUL (which is the
> implication) then you may as well > just advocate that all browsers support XUL. In > which case, XUL doesn't > need to be part of HTML but instead an alternative > markup for web apps. And you do a full circle. Well, as I see it it's all about marketing. Nobody cares about XUL. Not even Mozilla. If you want to get the world's attention than you have to build on the HTML success story and tell everybody look here's HTML 7 - now all new and improved. It's the Web 2.0 or the Web Reloaded. That's how people start to understand what you're talking about. If you start to talk about XML UI languages and a next-gen browser for a rich internet for everyone. Noone will have a clue what it's all about. - Gerald PS: How about rebranding the XUL Alliance to the Web 2.0 Foundation using the acronym WTF? Just kidding. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
