Hello, Heng Yuan writes on the CookXml project site:
The fundamental goal of CookSwing and CookSwt is to provide specific supports for GUI packages and free up programmers from doing tedious GUI hard coding and cleanup the code, WITHOUT compromising functionality. Yet, it is different from XMLEncoder/Decoder provided by JDK, which is tedious/unreadable in XML. CookXml/CookSwing/CookSwt intend to provide powerful yet concise representation of GUI (or whatever objects) in XML. I believe in writing a program that does well what it is supposed to do. I am not interested in a XUL that can be run anywhere; after all, Swing and SWT are portable themselves. If you are switching from Swing to SWT, or vice versa, tough luck with any XML toolkits. So, in the mean time, pick the one that provides the best use the GUI :) More @ http://cookxml.sourceforge.net Has anyone tried out CookSwing? How does it differ from lets say JellySwing ord SwiXml? - Gerald -------------------- Gerald Bauer Web Start Forum | http://webstartforum.com Web Start News Wire | http://webstartnews.com Web Start F.A.Q. | http://webstartfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
