Do you agree with Jon Perez that there's not much value in Mozilla XUL as long as its bound to the overengineered RDF, XPCOM, XPInstall, XPFE, XBL and so on machinery?
XBL? He doesn't even mention XBL! Besides, why would we try to remove XBL when we have a W3C standardized version of it right on the horizon?
My opinion is that he's describing my XUL Basic concept pretty well, but if you're not concerned about the overhead the technologies above provide, what he wants can just as easily be provided by simply adding Python support to the existing Mozilla platform.
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list xul-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
