> Mmmmh... It is restricting possible loading scenarii, since F is not > symmetric (imagine somebody wants to assign all 9 components of F).
I was talking about 6 stress components. Oce can always express deformation with 6 components in "isotropic" (approximately) material since rotation (remaining 3 components) doesn't change bulk properties. If someone really needs that then, he will be smart to write such thing himself/herself, I think. (Political thing again, ratinally it has both pros (flexibility) and cons (work), which have to be weighted based on assumed usage of the most flexible scenario; to me it seems zero) > They are two different ways to apply the goal stress. I thought > stiffness was broken (is it or not?), that is why I used the inertial > way. > I think it is overestimated about by factor of 2, leading me to think it is almost right except something small like counting interactions twice or such; I haven't checked the code since then carefully. v _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
