On 18 May 2010 16:57, Bruno Chareyre <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> No. It is the increment of displacement. > > Example : > 1) time t : us_total=1, us_elastic=0.1, us_plastic=0.9, fs=0.1*ks > 2) assume an increment dus between t and t+dt > 3) trialFs = previousFs + dus*ks = us_elastic*ks + dus*ks = > ks*(us_elastic+dus) > 4) 1/ks*(trialFs-previousFs) = ? .... dus > Ok, I was clearly seeing trialFs in the wrong way, sorry. So now to me it is corrected the way you proposed for the friction dissipation (not the current one but the revised one I reported in the previous mail). If you agree could you commit it, please? Thanks. Chiara > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
