On 8 December 2010 08:45, Bruno Chareyre <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > Ah sorry I got it now. I does apply but I will have to create these > > MatchMaker objects into Ip2. Bruno, since it is your code, what do you > > prefer? You said you would like to keep only flags in the functor. > > By "only flags", I meant no physical parameters. Previous Vaclav's proposal > is on the same > line : parameters in bodies, translation into interaction physics in > functor using > matchmakers (matchmaker are not a physical parameters, more sub-functors). > So, I have no > objection of principle. > > I have a few reserves however. In my experience, the more advanced > functionalities are > used, the more it will need me time to maintain the code. It is also more > difficult for > one reading the code. So, please Chiara, don't do that if you don't really > need it (i.e. > if you don't plan to test dozens of averaging formula), and better keep the > hardcoded > harmonic average we have now. > Ok, no problem with that! cheers, chiara > > Cheers. > > Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
